Film Review: Ex_Machina (15) (U.S.A./U.K. 2015) (Director: Alex Garland), The Cameo Cinema Screen One, Edinburgh, Sunday 25.01.2015 17:40

This is a triple-hander of a film. The three central characters being a C.E.O. of a search engine company, one of his low-level employees and this 'artificial intelligence' that the C.E.O. has created called Ava. The CEO having invited the employee to his secluded residence to be part of a 'Turing test', where he is to interact with the machine and detect if he can at some point loose the sense of it being an artificial being. 

I was drawn to the film due to it's visual style, which did not disappoint. Sadly the rest of the film was a bit of a let-down. There is a supposed twist towards the end, though I felt the films progression to be fairly clear and guessable from the start. 

It is not to spoil anything to say that  the employee reaches a point of seeing the machine as having consciousness. How is this possible when all of the machine's drawings throughout the film are clearly hexagon based. Also the machine's facial micro-expressions are always slightly stilted and therefore clearly not human. This is clearly down to good acting, though it does make other characters look a bit stupid. Maybe this is part of the point. Maybe the film is trying to say that if you put an attractive face on anything then (horny) man will not notice these little things, as they don't fit the reality the man wants to see. Emotion overrules intelligence. This is a film I would neither recommend nor try to dissuade others from trying to see. 

Rating: 06/10.          

Film Review: Enemy (15) (Canada/Spain 2013) (Director: Denis Villeneuve), Filmhouse, Screen Three, Edinburgh, Saturday 03.01.2015, 20:35

I was drawn to this film due to the fact that it is another film staring Jake Gyllenhall and directed by Denis Villeneuve, who previously worked together on 'Prisoners' (2013). Jake plays a university history lecturer who is listless and disinterested in life. A colleague suggests a film he may enjoy and within that film he sees his exact doppelganger who he then pursues. I don't wish to say more regarding the plot, though do feel it is fare to say that the film approaches the idea of a doppelganger in a fresh manner. 

The film makes very good use of lighting to induce a queasy/twilight sort of quality. The editing is done in a manner that, along with Jake's nuanced acting, gives the film a  mysterious/enigmatic quality. Having given the film my full concentration, I am still unraveling it now the day after having seen it. It is not often that can be said in these times where most filmmakers feel they have to spell out exactly what is happening. The sudden ending is both bamboozling and revealing, as long as you don't allow the bamboozling element to lead you to dismiss what you have seen.  

I feel this is a fundamentally more interesting film than 'Prisoners', as good as that was, though don't feel I can go quite as far as saying it is excellent. Jake is developing quite a habit of making very good films that are not quite excellent. I find myself having to give the same rating as 'Prisoners' & 'Nightcrawler' (2014). 

Rating: 09/10.      

Film Review: Birdman (or the Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (15) (U.S.A. 2014) (Director: Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu), The Cameo Cinema Screen One, Edinburgh, Saturday 03.01.2015 15:40

I am a great fan of this directors film from 2000, 'Amores Perros', though this is the first film that director has made since that I was intrigued enough by to wish to go and see. 

This is the film about an actor who used to play a superhero who is now pursuing putting on a credible stage production on Broadway to rescue some semblance of dignity and respect. The film also appears to be in a very flippant way to be ab out telekinesis. 

The only things that rescue this film from being complete and utter pretentious tosh are the performances by Amy Ryan, Naomi Watts, Andrea Riseborough and most notably Emma Stone. Emma Stone's performance, in the size of role she has, is really very commendable. She is easily the most naturalistic of all the cast.

It appears to me as though the director may have had a fluke back in 2000, and my resistance to his subsequent work is now reinforced. Don't waste a couple of hours of your like on this vanity project. 

Rating: 04/10.    

TOP 10 LIVE PERFORMANCES OF 2014:

2014 was a quieter year than last, hence why I am only doing a top 10 of live performances.
----------
1.) Sister Marie Keyrouz L'Ensemble De La Paix, 13.08.2014, Greyfriars Kirk, Edinburgh

2.) Akram Khan Company perform Gnosis, 20.08.2014, King's Theatre, Edinburgh

3.) Iron & Wine (Solo Acoustic), 16.11.2014, Adelphi Theatre, London

4.) Robert Newman's New Theory of Evolution, 15.08.2014, Stand in the Square, The Stand Comedy Club, Edinburgh

5.) Tanztheater Wuppertal Pina Bausch perform Sweet Mambo, 24.08.2014, The Edinburgh Playhouse, Edinburgh

6.) Philharmonia Orchestra perform Britten's War Requiem, 14.08.2014, Usher Hall, Edinburgh

7.) Ladysmith Black Mambazo, 09.08.2014, The Edinburgh Playhouse, Edinburgh

8.) Toumani Diabate & Sidiki Diabate, 29.05.2014, Usher Hall, Edinburgh

9.) Abdullah Ibrahim, 18.07.2014, The Festival Theatre, Edinburgh

10.) Billy Connolly: High Horse Tour Scotland 2014, 04.10.2014, Usher Hall, Edinburgh

TOP 10 FILMS OF 2014:

2014 has felt like a mixed bag in terms of good films. I have only seen 9 new films which I would consider to be 10/10 or better, though this has also been the year that saw the release of Ida, which I already consider one of my all time favorites. 

----------

1. Ida (Pawel Pawlikowski)

2. 12 Years a Slave (Steve McQueen)

3. The Double (Richard Ayoade)

4. Gone Girl (David Fincher)

5. God Help The Girl (Stuart Murdoch)

6. Wakolda (Lucia Puenzo)

7. Winter’s Sleep (Nuri Bilge Ceylan)

8. Leviathan (Andrey Zvyagintsev)

9. The Raid 2 (Gareth Evens)

10. Tracks (John Curran)

Film Review: Big Eyes (12A) (U.S.A. 2014) (Director: Tim Burton), Filmhouse, Screen One, Edinburgh, Monday 29.12.2014, 20:35

I was intrigued by this film due to how unburtony the promotional coverage was. Tim Burton is a director I have a lot of time for, though he can be hit 'n' miss. The film tells the true story of Margaret & Walter Keane. At the point of meeting for the first time, Margaret understands Walter to be a fellow artist. After they were married Walter begins to take credit for Margaret's very distinctive work using the rationale that people don't buy female art. By this being a true story, it is predictable from the off that this lands up in court.

The film was a good presentation of how socially in the 1950's and 1960's it was very normal for wives to be dominated by their husbands in the U.S. of A., to the extent of their self identity becoming vastly compromised. 

Amy Adams was very good as someone trying to do the best they can in difficult circumstances. Regrettably Christoph Waltz's character was like a great big slab of ham. I understand that it is possible that this may be a fairly accurate portrayal, though it still felt too heavily acted. 

The film distracts itself for a period, to put over questions about what is art. I feel this unnecessarily complicates the film as is not relevant to the central strong thread to the film, that of someone being denied ownership of their work, work that is also very popular with others despite what art critics may think.  

The film is a good watch, a reasonably well told though flawed yarn, though to me it is not up there with the best of Mr. Burton's work.   

Rating: 07/10.